In re the Arbitration between Elora Realty, Inc. & William Savage, Inc.

114 N.E.2d 39, 305 N.Y. 842, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1338
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 14, 1953·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

It is unnecessary to decide whether or not article 40 is a general arbitration clause since the dispute in this instance is as to a matter which, by article 39, is specifically made subject to arbitration by way of appeal from a decision of the architect. Although respondent’s demand for arbitration was, under article 39, premature since served before the architect had rendered a decision, that irregularity should not destroy respondent’s rights to have the dispute arbitrated now that the architect, as shown by the record here, has issued his certifications in writing that respondent has breached the contract and that nothing is due respondent thereon.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Arbitration between Elora Realty, Inc. & William Savage, Inc., 114 N.E.2d 39, 305 N.Y. 842, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1338 (N.Y. 1953).

114 N.E.2d 39 (In re the Arbitration between Elora Realty, Inc. & William Savage, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Arbitration between Dana Realty Corp. & Consolidated Electric Construction Co.
21 A.D.2d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)