In re the Arbitration between Durant & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

207 N.E.2d 600, 15 N.Y.2d 408, 260 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1406
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 22, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 207 N.E.2d 600 (In re the Arbitration between Durant & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Durant & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp., 207 N.E.2d 600, 15 N.Y.2d 408, 260 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1406 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The petitioner’s demand for arbitration was in the role of an “ insured ’ ’ under the terms of a motor vehicle liability policy which contained an endorsement providing coverage by the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation against injury by an uninsured vehicle in pursuance of subdivision 2-a of section 167 of the Insurance Law.

This subdivision also authorizes the board of directors of the corporation to prescribe the conditions of coverage subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Insurance. The endorsement setting up arbitration expressly provided that ‘ Any amount payable ” under the terms of the endorsement “ shall be reduced by ” amounts paid under any workmen’s compensation law.

Appellant was entitled, therefore, to have deducted from the $10,000 found by the arbitrator as the amount payable the sum of $6,710 paid petitioner as workmen’s compensation benefits. That a “Qualified person ” (not an insured) making a claim under section 610 of the Insurance Law would not have an award reduced by compensation payments does not invalidate the specific terms of the submission to arbitration under a valid policy endorsement. Claimant was entitled to interest from the time of the award under sections 480 and 1464 of the Civil Practice Act then in effect.

[412]*412The order of the Appellate Division should be modified to the extent of deducting workmen’s compensation benefits from the award and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ExxonMobil Oil Corporation v. TIG Insurance Company
44 F.4th 163 (Second Circuit, 2022)
National Avenue Building Co. v. Stewart
972 S.W.2d 649 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)
Burke v. First UNUM Life Ins. Co.
975 F. Supp. 310 (S.D. New York, 1997)
White v. Ramirez
159 Misc. 2d 925 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
House v. American Family Mutual Insurance
837 P.2d 391 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1992)
Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft Board
157 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Russo v. Kemper Group
146 A.D.2d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Fox v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
132 A.D.2d 17 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Amato
129 A.D.2d 221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
City of New York v. Collins
126 Misc. 2d 377 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority v. Evans
95 A.D.2d 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Thamert v. Continental Casualty Co.
621 P.2d 702 (Utah Supreme Court, 1980)
Niagara County v. Utica Mutual Insurance
103 Misc. 2d 814 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Board of Education v. Niagara-Wheatfield Teachers Ass'n
389 N.E.2d 104 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
In re the Arbitration between Government Employees Insurance & Lombino
57 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Walkowitz v. Royal Globe Insurance Company
374 A.2d 40 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
In re the Arbitration between Penta & Liberty Mutual Insurance
51 A.D.2d 125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Glickman
84 Misc. 2d 33 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
Sweeney v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.
347 A.2d 380 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. Basile
48 A.D.2d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 N.E.2d 600, 15 N.Y.2d 408, 260 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-durant-motor-vehicle-accident-ny-1965.