In Re the Arbitration Between Cuzdey & American Motorists Insurance

343 N.E.2d 287, 37 N.Y.2d 939, 380 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2341
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 1975·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Both courts below were vested with discretion to be exercised in the light of all the facts and relevant circumstances in the given case, reviewable to a limited extent in this court. We are not disposed to overrule the exercise of discretion by the Appellate Division. (Cf. Murray v City of New York, 30 NY2d 113.)

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Arbitration Between Cuzdey & American Motorists Insurance, 343 N.E.2d 287, 37 N.Y.2d 939, 380 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2341 (N.Y. 1975).

343 N.E.2d 287 (In Re the Arbitration Between Cuzdey & American Motorists Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & Jimenez
78 N.Y.2d 1054 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Federal Insurance v. Cata
158 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Eveready Insurance v. Saunders
149 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Home Indemnity Co. v. Messana
139 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Arbitration between Travelers Insurance & Ford
103 Misc. 2d 1005 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & Ihne
61 A.D.2d 743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)