Federal Insurance v. Cata

158 A.D.2d 523, 551 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1765
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 A.D.2d 523 (Federal Insurance v. Cata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Federal Insurance v. Cata, 158 A.D.2d 523, 551 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

We find that the court properly granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration. The appellant concedes that she failed to file a statement under oath within 90 days of the accident as required when a claim of a hit-and-run accident is made under the uninsured motorist endorsement of her automobile insurance policy. No reasonable excuse for the failure to comply with this condition precedent to coverage was provided. Consequently, the permanent stay of arbitration was proper as there was no issue of fact requiring determination (see, Matter of Home Indem. Co. v Messana, 139 AD2d 513; Gizzi v State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 56 AD2d 973; Matter of Cuzdey [American Motorists Ins. Co.], 45 AD2d 134, affd 37 NY2d 939). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Arbitration between Progressive Insurance & Morales
236 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D.2d 523, 551 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/federal-insurance-v-cata-nyappdiv-1990.