In re the Arbitration between C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. & Antonio Corrao Corp.

285 A.D. 953, 139 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6284
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 7, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 A.D. 953 (In re the Arbitration between C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. & Antonio Corrao Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. & Antonio Corrao Corp., 285 A.D. 953, 139 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

In an arbitration proceeding respondent was awarded $3,408.75 for goods sold and delivered. This represented the amount demanded in the arbitration proceeding. The arbitrators also awarded interest amounting to $754.47 on the award, although the submission of the controversy to arbitration did not provide for interest. The arbitrators also directed appellant to pay administration fees of $102.28 to respondent and $145.90 to the American Arbitration Association. The appeals are from an order and judgment (one paper) confirming the award and from an order and judgment (one paper) denying a motion to modify the award by deleting therefrom interest and administration fees. Orders and judgments unanimously affirmed, with costs. The claim of respondent was for a liquidated sum. The award of interest was proper. (Matter of Burke, 117 App. Div. 477, afiid. 191 N. Y. 437.) The case of People ex rel. Cranford Co. v. Willcox (153 App. Div. 759, mod. 207 N. Y. 743) is not to the contrary. There interest was disallowed on an unliquidated claim for extra work. The arbitrators properly awarded administration fees to respondent and against appellant on both the claims of respondent and the counterclaim of appellant under the rules of the American Arbitration Association which governed the submission. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Arbitration between Kennedy, & Dominick International Corp.
55 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 A.D. 953, 139 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-c-f-simonins-sons-inc-antonio-corrao-nyappdiv-1955.