In re the Arbitration between Brighton Mills, Inc. & Rayon Corp. of America

282 A.D. 670, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4628
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 17, 1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

We find on the facts here that the parties stipulated to proceed in this arbitration with associate counsel present for a short time and with regular counsel present the next day. There has been no showing of prejudice. We find nothing else in the conduct of the arbitrators which could be considered misconduct. All of the complaints of [671]*671substance relate to alleged errors of fact or law made by the arbitrators, which we may not review. Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion to confirm the award granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Bergan, JJ. [See ante, p. 669.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Arbitration between Brighton Mills, Inc. & Rayon Corp. of America, 282 A.D. 670, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 670 (In re the Arbitration between Brighton Mills, Inc. & Rayon Corp. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Arbitration between Phillips & American Casualty Co.
10 A.D.2d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
In re the Arbitration between Big-W Construction Corp. & Horowitz
24 Misc. 2d 145 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)