In re the Arbitration between Baar & Beards, Inc. & Oleg Cassini, Inc.

282 N.E.2d 624, 30 N.Y.2d 649, 331 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1435
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 1972·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

An order vacating an arbitration award and directing a new arbitration before new arbitrators is final and appealable. (See, e.g., Matter of Milliken Woolens [Weber [651] Knit Sportswear], 8 N Y 2d 1025, rearg. den. 8 N Y 2d 1157; Matter of Colony Liq. Distrs. [Local 669, Int. Brotherhood of Teamsters], 28 N Y 2d 596.) On the record before us, there can be no doubt that respondent knowingly waived its objection to the arbitrator Hessen when—after the latter affirmed his prior dealings with petitioner-appellant’s president and before the hearings commenced—it explicitly stated in writing that The panel is acceptable to the Parties.” Accordingly, the order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and petitioner’s motion to confirm the award granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Arbitration between Baar & Beards, Inc. & Oleg Cassini, Inc., 282 N.E.2d 624, 30 N.Y.2d 649, 331 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1435 (N.Y. 1972).

282 N.E.2d 624 (In re the Arbitration between Baar & Beards, Inc. & Oleg Cassini, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Werline
307 S.W.3d 267 (Texas Supreme Court, 2010)
Santana v. Country-Wide Insurance
177 Misc. 2d 1 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1998)
In re Town of Greenburgh
94 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
De Camp v. Good Samaritan Hospital
66 A.D.2d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
INTERNAT'L BROTH. OF TEAM. v. Bergen-Hudson Roofing Supply Co.
387 A.2d 1246 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)