In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Ramos

234 A.D.2d 41, 650 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12283
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 5, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 234 A.D.2d 41 (In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Ramos, 234 A.D.2d 41, 650 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about July 31, 1995, which granted [42]*42petitioner’s application to stay arbitration of respondent’s uninsured motorist claim and vacated any award that may have been rendered in petitioner’s absence from the arbitration and which denied respondent’s cross motion for change of venue to Kings County, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny a stay of arbitration and to reinstate the award, and otherwise affirmed, with costs to respondent-appéllant.

Consistent with New York public policy to protect innocent victims of traffic accidents (Rosado v Eveready Ins. Co., 34 NY2d 43, 48), personal protection insurance liability coverage underwritten in a sister State by insurers authorized to do business in New York is required to conform to New York minimum financial requirements and, if not, is deemed to do so (Insurance Law § 5107 [a]; 11 NYCRR 65.5). Accordingly, the IAS Court erred in staying arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim made by a passenger injured in an automobile insured under an out-of-State policy that included liability coverage but did not provide for uninsured motorist coverage. Matter of Transamerica Ins. Group (Markland) (107 AD2d 591) is distinguishable in that the policy there contained no liability coverage whatsoever. The cross motion for a change of venue was properly denied (CPLR 7502 [a]). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Torcivia
277 A.D.2d 321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Gonzalez v. Medina
184 Misc. 2d 739 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
Allstate Insurance v. Lopez
266 A.D.2d 209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Midwest Mutual Insurance v. Pisani
250 A.D.2d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D.2d 41, 650 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-allstate-insurance-ramos-nyappdiv-1996.