In re the Application for an Order to Strike from the Enrollment Book of the Sixteenth Election District

117 A.D. 628, 102 N.Y.S. 845, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 311
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Laughlin, J. :

In this case the affidavit which asserts the facts positively shows that the elector whose name it is sought to strike from the enrollment book, enrolled from Ho. 9 Mulberry street, and that the affiant resides at that number, but it does not show whether it is a private house or boarding house or a tenement, or whether the affiant is the janitor, lessee or proprietor, or that he is in a position to know the facts. We are of opinion that the rule laid down in the opinion in Matter of Titus (117 App. Div. 621), argued and decided herewith, should be applied here, and that the order should be affirmed upon the authority of the decision in that matter.

Patterson, P. J., concurred; Clarke and Ingraham, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Application for an Order to Strike from the Enrollment Book of the Sixteenth Election District, 117 A.D. 628, 102 N.Y.S. 845, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

117 A.D. 628 (In re the Application for an Order to Strike from the Enrollment Book of the Sixteenth Election District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Elections v. Keleher
124 A.D. 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
In re the Application for an Order to Strike from the Enrollment Book of the Twentieth Election District
117 A.D. 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)