In Re the Accounting of McDowell
This text of 130 N.E. 910 (In Re the Accounting of McDowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of Appellate Division and decree of surrogate modified by striking out provision surcharging accounts of trustees with the sum of $13,445, invested in Rochester, Syracuse and Eastern railway bonds and certain interest; also by inserting a clause providing that on payment of sum charged against them as invested in certain other securities mentioned in the decree, the trustees be subrogated to the rights of estate to said securities, and as so modified said order of Appellate Division is affirmed, without costs to either party; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Hogan, J., dissents from modification relating to Rochester, Syracuse and Eastern railway bonds.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 N.E. 910, 230 N.Y. 601, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-mcdowell-ny-1921.