in Re: Terrence M. Gore

454 S.W.3d 711
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 26, 2015·No. 05-15-00076-CV·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice Brown

This petition for writ of mandamus arises from a contempt proceeding based on relator’s failure to pay child support. Relator requests that the Court vacate a number of trial court orders including the order of contempt. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2004) (orig.proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude the relator has failed to establish a right to relief. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Terrence M. Gore, 454 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

454 S.W.3d 711 (in Re: Terrence M. Gore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

in the Interest of B.T.G., a Minor Child
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2017
in Re: Terrence M. Gore
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015