In re Synovia G.

163 A.D.2d 257
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 26, 1990·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Final order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Bruce Kaplan, J.), entered on or about January 10, 1989, which placed appellant’s grandchildren in the custody of petitioner, Commissioner of Social Services, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Commissioner of Social Services charged that respondent smoked marihuana, left her grandchildren with their natural mother, a crack addict, and threatened her daughter with a meat cleaver while the children were present. Roberta Nelson, while working as a homemaker between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., testified at the fact-finding hearing that she witnessed the above events. The respondent did not appear at the hearing.

In view of the above facts the court did not err in finding that the respondent neglected her grandchildren. (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B].) Proof that a caretaker repeatedly misuses a drug is prima facie evidence of neglect. (Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [iii]; see, Matter of Theresa J., 158 AD2d 364.) Here, the evidence of respondent’s use of marihuana, leaving the children alone with their mother, a crack user, and chasing the mother with a meat cleaver, was sufficient to support a finding of neglect under the statute. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Milonas and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Synovia G., 163 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

163 A.D.2d 257 (In re Synovia G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Messiah T.
94 A.D.3d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Taisha R.
14 A.D.3d 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Matter of D. M. (Norma M.)
2003 NY Slip Op 51490 (New York Family Court, 2003)
In re Krewsean S.
273 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re William T.
185 A.D.2d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)