In re Messiah T.

94 A.D.3d 566, 942 N.Y.S.2d 344
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 17, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 94 A.D.3d 566 (In re Messiah T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Messiah T., 94 A.D.3d 566, 942 N.Y.S.2d 344 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about August 16, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, brings up for review a fact-finding determination that respondent mother had neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that respondent neglected the children by failing to provide proper supervision or guardianship (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]). Indeed, respondent admitted that she had left the children in the care of their maternal grandmother, who had a history of drug addiction, and her ex-boyfriend, who had a history of drug abuse and domestic violence, and was on parole for drug possession (see Matter of Victor V., 261 AD2d 479, 479-480 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 819 [1999]; Matter of Synovia G., 163 AD2d 257 [1990]). In addition, respondent acknowledged that she was a recreational drug user and admitted testing positive for narcotics. Although respondent was enrolled in a drug treatment program, the record shows that she tested positive for drug use while participating in the program, thereby establishing imminent risk to the children’s physical, mental and emotional condition (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; Matter of Keira O., 44 AD3d 668, 670-671 [2007]). The finding of neglect is also supported by evidence that respondent was aggressive with petitioner’s staff, and had failed to continue treatment for her mental illness despite suicidal thoughts (see Matter of Kayla W., 47 AD3d 571, 572 [2008]; Matter of Caress S., 250 AD2d 490 [1998]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Kahlani G. (Kalesky G.)
2020 NY Slip Op 07703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
S., BROOKLYN, MTR. OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Matter of Brooklyn S. (Stafania Q.)
2017 NY Slip Op 3677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
In re Liarah H.
111 A.D.3d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 A.D.3d 566, 942 N.Y.S.2d 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-messiah-t-nyappdiv-2012.