In re Straus

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

In re Straus

46 F. 522, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1308

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided April 21, 1891·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

Taking the language of the new tariff act as a whole and in its entirety, from beginning to end, I cannot escape the conviction that it manifests a plain intention to substitute that tariff act in the place and stead of all prior tariff legislation, so far, at least, as such legislation lays a duty upon imported articles of any kind. The decision of the appraisers is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

Taking the language of the new tariff act as a whole and in its entirety, from beginning to end, I cannot escape the conviction that it manifests a plain intention to substitute that tariff act in the place and stead of all prior tariff legislation, so far, at least, as such legislation lays a duty upon imported articles of any kind. The decision of the appraisers is therefore affirmed.

In re Straus, 46 F. 522, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1308 (circtsdny 1891).

Pincite

46 F. 522 (In re Straus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related