In Re Stolzle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In Re Stolzle

7 So. 3d 660, 2009 La. LEXIS 355, 2009 WL 1397102

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 29, 2009

Docket2009-B-0934

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 So. 3d 660 (In Re Stolzle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Stolzle, 7 So. 3d 660, 2009 La. LEXIS 355, 2009 WL 1397102 (La. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, Frederick A. Stolzle, Jr., and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that Frederick A. Stolzle, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 12497, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension filed by respondent, Frederick A. Stolzle, Jr., and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that Frederick A. Stolzle, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 12497, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.3, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 So. 3d 660, 2009 La. LEXIS 355, 2009 WL 1397102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stolzle-la-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack