in Re Steven Hotze M.D.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 11, 2022·No. 14-22-00656-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00656-CV

IN RE STEVEN HOTZE M.D., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-18494

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 9, 2022, relator Steven Hotze M.D. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Donna Roth, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to withdraw an order granting a motion to compel net worth discovery from Steven Hotze and issue a mandate upholding his objections to the discovery request. Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Steven Hotze M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re Steven Hotze M.D. (in Re Steven Hotze M.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.