in Re Steven Hotze M.D.
This text of in Re Steven Hotze M.D. (in Re Steven Hotze M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00656-CV
IN RE STEVEN HOTZE M.D., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-18494
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 9, 2022, relator Steven Hotze M.D. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Donna Roth, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to withdraw an order granting a motion to compel net worth discovery from Steven Hotze and issue a mandate upholding his objections to the discovery request. Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Steven Hotze M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-hotze-md-texapp-2022.