in Re Steven Hotze M.D.
This text of in Re Steven Hotze M.D. (in Re Steven Hotze M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 28, 2021.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00580-CV
IN RE STEVEN HOTZE, M.D., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-18494
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 15, 2021, relator Steven Hotze, M.D., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Donna Roth, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to set aside her August 20, 2021 order compelling relator’s responses to requests for productions and October 5, 2021 order enforcing court orders against relator. Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Steven Hotze M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-steven-hotze-md-texapp-2021.