In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—report 2017-02

229 So. 3d 295
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 2017
DocketSC17-1439
StatusPublished

This text of 229 So. 3d 295 (In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—report 2017-02) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—report 2017-02, 229 So. 3d 295 (Fla. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee) has submitted proposed changes to the standard jury instructions and asks that the Court authorize the amended standard instructions for publication and use. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Committee proposes amending the following existing standard instructions pertaining to prostitution-related offenses: 23.1 (Maintaining a Place of Prostitution, Lewdness, or Assignation); 23.2 (Soliciting for the Purpose of Prostitution or a Lewd or Indecent Act); 23.3 (Receiving for the Purpose of Prostitution, Lewdness or Assignation); 23.4 (Transporting for the Purpose of Prostitution, Lewdness or Assignation); 23.5 (Offering to Commit, Committing, or Engaging in Prostitution, Lewdness, or Assignation); 23.6 (Soliciting for Prostitution, Lewdness, or Assignation);' and 23.7 (Entering for the Purpose of Prostitution, Lewdness, or Assignation). Following publication of its proposals, the Committee received one comment from the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers- (FAGDL). After the Committee filed its report,. the Court did not. publish the proposals. The Court authorizes for publication, and use instructions 23.1 through 23.7 as proposed.

The Committee made a number of changes to its proposals based upon the comment by the FACDL, as discussed below, but rejected the suggestion to clarify that prior related offenses are an’ element of the current offense, on the basis that the Court previously rejected the idea that the issue of “element or recidivist factor” could be decided in a jury instruction case, citing In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report No. 2015-08, 194 So.3d 1007 (Fla. 2016). We- adhere to that earlier decision. Instead, the Committee revised the Comment section of each instruction to address this situation.

The more significant amendments to the instructions are discussed below.

The following amendment is applicable to all of the instructions herein at issue. Because section 796.036, Florida Statutes, was repealed by the Legislature in 2014, all references to that provision and the paragraph thereunder are removed. See ch. 2014-160, § 10, Laws of Fla. (repealing § 796.036, Fla. Stat.).

With regard to instructions 23.1, 23.3, 23.4, and 23.7, which include the definition of “structure,” these instructions are also amended to include a citation to Dubose v. State, 210 So.3d 641 (Fla. 2017), and the following sentence placed in brackets is added to the definition of “structure”: “The enclosure need not be continuous as it may have an ungated opening for entering and exiting,” ,

Next, because the offense instructed upon in instruction 23.1 provides for reclassification pursuant to section 796.07(7), Florida Statutes, which increases the degree of the crime if the place, structure, building, or conveyance that .is owned, established, maintained, or operated in violation of the statute is a massage establishment that is or should be licensed, a new paragraph is also added that allows the jury to make a determination as to whether the State, proved that the reclassification applies. Statutory definitions for “massage establishment,” “massage therapist,” and “massage,” from chapter 480, Florida Statutes, are also added,- -

Instruction 23.5 is further amended to add a second .element to the offense of Offering to Commit, Committing, or Engaging in Prostitution, Lewdness, or Assignation, which requires the State to prove that the defendant was 18 years of age or older at the time of his/her act. See § 796.07(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (2016).

Last, instruction 23.6 is further amended to redefine the term “solicit,” in accord with section 777.04(2), Florida Statutes.

Having considered the Committee’s report, criminal jury ' instructions' 23.1 through 23.7, as proposed by the Committee, and as set forth in the appendix to this opinion, are hereby authorized for publication and use. 1 New language is indicated by underlining, and deleted language is indicated by struck-through type. In authorizing the publication and use of these instructions, we express no opinion on their correctness and remind all interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or alternative instructions nor contesting the legal correctness of the instructions. We further caution all interested parties that any comments associated with the instructions reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily indicative of the views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. The instructions as- set forth in the appendix shall be effective when this opinion becomes final.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

23.1 MAINTAINING A PLACE OF PROSTITUTION, LEWDNESS, OR ASSIGNATION

§ 796.07(2)(a), Fla. Stat.

To prove tlie crime of Maintaining a Place, of [Prostitution] [Lewdness] [Assignation], the State must prove the following element beyond a reasonable doubt:

(Defendant) [established] [owned] [maintained] [operated] any [place] [structure] [building] [conveyance] for the purpose of [lewdness] [assignation] [prostitution].

Give if applicable. § 796.07(7)(a), Fla. Stat.; § m-Om), Fla. Stat; § 180.033, Fla. Stat.

If you find the defendant guilty of Maintaining a Place of [Prostitution] [Lewdness] [Assignation], you must also determine whether the State has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the [place] [structure] [building] [conveyance] that was [established] [owned] [maintained] [operated] for the purpose of [lewdness] [assignation] [prostitution] was a massage establishment that was or should have been licensed by the Florida Department of Health.

All “massage establishments” must be licensed by the Florida Department of Health. A “massage establishment” means a site or premises, or portion thereof, wherein a massage therapist practices massage. A “massage therapist” means a person licensed as required by law who administers massage for compensation. “Massage” means the manipulation. of the soft tissues of the human body with the hand, foot, arm, or elbow, whether or not such manipulation is aided by hydrotherapy, including colonic irrigation, or thermal therapy; any electrical or mechanical device; or the application to the human body of a chemical or herbal preparation.

• Give-if applicable, ■Fla.-^t, § -796.036

If you find the defendant guilty- of Maintaining a Place of [Prostitution] [Lewdness]—[Assignation],—you—must then determine whether—the State has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that;

a,—A minor was engaged-in the [prostitution] [lewdness] [assignation] [sexual-conduct] [ (other conduct prohibited in-Chapter 796) ]; and,

&—The minor was not- the person charged in this case.

Definitions.

§ 796.07(l)(a), Fla. Stat.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Standard Jury Instruct. in Criminal Cases No. 2008-04
995 So. 2d 476 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2015-08
194 So. 3d 1007 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
Rasheem Diquoine Dubose v. State of Florida
210 So. 3d 641 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report 2012-07
122 So. 3d 302 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report No. 2010-03
35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 559 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 So. 3d 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-standard-jury-instructions-in-criminal-casesreport-2017-02-fla-2017.