In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2015-08

194 So. 3d 1007, 2016 WL 3654189
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 2016
DocketSC15-2372
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 194 So. 3d 1007 (In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2015-08) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2015-08, 194 So. 3d 1007, 2016 WL 3654189 (Fla. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee) has submitted proposed changes to the standard jury instructions in criminal cases and asks that the Court authorize the amended standard instructions. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Committee proposes amending the following existing standard criminal jury instructions: 8.3 (Battery); 21.16 (Falsely Personating an Officer); 23.1 (Maintaining a Place of Prostitution, Lewdness, or Assignation); 23.2 (Soliciting for the Purpose of Prostitution or a Lewd or Indecent Act); 23.3 (Receiving for the Purpose of Prostitution, Lewdness or .-Assignation); 23.4 (Transporting for the Purpose of Prostitution, Lewdness or Assignation); 23.5 (Offering to Commit, Committing, or Engaging in Prostitution, Lewdness, or Assignation); 23.6 (Soliciting for Prostitution, Lewdness, or Assignation); 23.7 (Entering for .the Purpose of Prostitution, Lewdness, or Assignation); 28.11 (Driving While License Suspended, Revoked or Canceled with Knowledge); 29.20 (Abuse of [An Elderly Person] [A Disabled Adult]); 29.21 (Aggravated Abuse of [An Elderly Person] [A Disabled Adult]);. and 29.22 (Neglect of [An Elderly Person] [Á Disabled Adult] ). 1

Before filing its report with the Court, the Committee published-its proposals for comment in The Florida Bar News. No comments were received by the Committee, and the Court did not publish' the proposals once filed by the Committee.

Having considered the Committee’s report, we amend standard jury instructions 8.3, 21.16, 29.20, 29.21, and 29.22 as proposed by the Committee and authorize them for publication and use. With respect' to the proposals to amend instructions 23.1-23.7 and 28.11, we decline to use the instant proceedings authorizing the publication and use of standard jury instructions -as the - basis for deciding a substantive issue — i.e., treating the statutory ¿nhancement as an element of the crime as opposed to a sentencing factor. Such matters are appropriate for consideration by this Court only within the context of an actual ease or controversy. See art. V, § 3(b), Fla. Const.; In re Std. Jury Instrs. in Crim. Cases -Report No. 2015-05, 195 *1008 So.3d 1088, 2016 WL 1375712, 41- Fla. L. Weekly S140 (Fla. April 7,- 2016).

The amended criminal jury instructions, as set forth in the appendix to this opinion, are hereby authorized for publication and use. 2 New language is indicated by underlining, and déleted language is indicated by struck-through type. In authorizing the publication and use of these instructions, we express no opinion on their correctness and remind all interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or alternative instructions nor contesting the legal correctness of the instructions. We further caution all interested parties that any comments associated with the instructions reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily indicative of the views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. The instructions as set forth in the appendix shall be effective when this opinion becomes final.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

8.3 BATTERY

§ 784.03, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Battery, the State must prove the following element beyond a reasonable doubt:

Give 1 and/or 2 as applicable,

1. £ (Defendant) intentionally touched or struck (victim) against [his] [her] will.]

2, {(Defendant) intentionally caused bodily harm to (victim).]

Give if the defendant is charged with hawing a prior 'conviction for battery, felony battery, or aggravated battery and after the jury found the defendant guilty. § 78Jp.03(2), Fla, Stat; State v. Harbaugh, 75j SoM 691 (Fla,2000).

Now that you have found (defendant) guilty of Battery, you must determine whether the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that [he] [she] has a prior conviction for battery [or aggravated battery] [or felony battery].

“Conviction” means a determination of guilt that resulted from a plea or trial, regardless of whether [he] [she] was adjudicated guilty or whether adjudication was withheld.

Lesser Included Offenses

[[Image here]]

*1009 Comment

This instruction was approved in 1981 and amended in 2016.

21.16 FALSELY PERSONATING AN OFFICER

§ 843.08, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Falsely Perso-nating An Officer, the State must prove the following [two] [three] elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Defendant) falsely assumed or pretended to be a[n] [police officer] [deputy sheriff] [sheriff] [firefighter] [officer of the Florida Highway Patrol] [officer of the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission] [officer — of--the Department of-Transportation]--[fire of arson investigator of the Department of Financial Services] [officer of the Department of Financial Services] [officer of the Department of Corrections] [correctional probation officer] [state attorney] [assistant state attorney] [statewide prosecutor] [assistant statewide prosecutor] [state attorney investigator]; [coroner] [lottery special agent] [lottery investigator] [beverage enforcement agent] [watchman] [member of the Parole Florida Commission on Offender Review] [administrative aide to the Parole Florida Commission on Offender Review] [supervisor employed by the Parole Florida Commission on Offender Review] [representative or personnel of the Department of Law Enforcement] [federal law enforcement officer].

2. While doing so, (defendant) [took it upon [himself] [herself] to act as such an officer] [required [someone] [ (name of person) ] to aid or assist [him] [her] in a matter pertaining to the duty of such an officer].

Give if applicable.

3. The impersonation occurred during the commission of a felony.

The court instructs you that (name of felony) is a felony. A[n] (name of felony) is defined as (insert elements of felony).

Definitions. Give if applicable.

§ 901.1505, Fla. Stat.

A federal law enforcement officer is a person who is employed by the Federal Government as a full-time law enforcement officer, who is empowered to effect an arrest for violations of the United States Code, who is authorized to carry firearms in the performance of her or his duties, and who has received law enforcement training equivalent to training for-Florida law enforcement officers.

§ 8⅛3.08, Fla. Stat:

A “watchman” means a security offi- . cer licensed under Chapter 493 of the Florida Statutes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 3d 1007, 2016 WL 3654189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-standard-jury-instructions-in-criminal-cases-report-no-2015-08-fla-2016.