Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/In re Sokolic

In re Sokolic

830 A.2d 953, 574 Pa. 325
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 30, 2003·No. No. 519 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

[326]*326PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 23, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sokolic, 830 A.2d 953, 574 Pa. 325 (Pa. 2003).

830 A.2d 953 (In re Sokolic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.