In re Sokolic

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Sokolic

830 A.2d 953

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 30, 2003·No. No. 519 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

[954]*954ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 23, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[954]*954ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 23, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

In re Sokolic, 830 A.2d 953 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

830 A.2d 953 (In re Sokolic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.