In re Smith

132 A.D.2d 64, 522 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49543
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 A.D.2d 784

Opinion

[65]*65OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on April 2, 1952.

On July 1, 1987, the respondent was convicted in the Supreme Court, Queens County, of perjury in the first degree (five counts), class D felonies (see, Penal Law § 210.15), and criminal contempt in the first degree (three counts), class E felonies (see, Penal Law § 215.51).

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon' his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and the clerk of the court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Smith, 132 A.D.2d 64, 522 N.Y.S.2d 7, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

132 A.D.2d 64 (In re Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 90
New York JUD § 90(4)
§ 210.15
New York PEN § 210.15
§ 215.51
New York PEN § 215.51