In re Smith

131 A.D.2d 285, 521 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48919
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 A.D.2d 784

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on June 25, 1947.

[286]*286On April 30, 1987, the respondent was convicted in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the second degree in violation of section 155.40 of the Penal Law, a class C felony. The respondent was sentenced to a term of probation for a period of five years, restitution of $6,800 having already been made.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), upon his conviction of a felony, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and it is directed that the respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Smith, 131 A.D.2d 285, 521 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

131 A.D.2d 285 (In re Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 90
New York JUD § 90(4)