In re S.J.
894 A.2d 1288, 586 Pa. 461, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 502
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 18, 2006·No. Petition No. 393 WAL 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED only with respect to Petitioner’s claim that the Superior Court failed to consider Curtis v. Kline, 542 Pa. 249, 666 A.2d 265 (1995). The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court, which shall consider and address Petitioner’s argument that the trial court’s order cannot be reconciled with this Court’s decision in Curtis. Furthermore, Respondent’s “Application to Vacate Supersede-as” is hereby DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re S.J., 894 A.2d 1288, 586 Pa. 461, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 502 (Pa. 2006).
894 A.2d 1288 (In re S.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Interest of S.J.
906 A.2d 547 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
In Re SJ
906 A.2d 547 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)