In re S.J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re S.J.

894 A.2d 1288

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 18, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[1289]*1289 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED only with respect to Petitioner’s claim that the Superior Court failed to consider Curtis v. Kline, 542 Pa. 249, 666 A.2d 265 (1995). The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court, which shall consider and address Petitioner’s argument that the trial court’s order cannot be reconciled with this Court’s decision in Curtis. Furthermore, Respondent’s “Application to Vacate Supersedeas” is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1289]*1289 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED only with respect to Petitioner’s claim that the Superior Court failed to consider Curtis v. Kline, 542 Pa. 249, 666 A.2d 265 (1995). The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court, which shall consider and address Petitioner’s argument that the trial court’s order cannot be reconciled with this Court’s decision in Curtis. Furthermore, Respondent’s “Application to Vacate Supersedeas” is hereby DENIED.

In re S.J., 894 A.2d 1288 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

894 A.2d 1288 (In re S.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related