In Re SJ

894 A.2d 1288
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 18, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 894 A.2d 1288 (In Re SJ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re SJ, 894 A.2d 1288 (Pa. 2006).

Opinion

894 A.2d 1288 (2006)

In re S.J., a Minor.
Petition of the Allegheny County Office of Children, Youth and Families.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 18, 2006.

*1289 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED only with respect to Petitioner's claim that the Superior Court failed to consider Curtis v. Kline, 542 Pa. 249, 666 A.2d 265 (1995). The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court, which shall consider and address Petitioner's argument that the trial court's order cannot be reconciled with this Court's decision in Curtis. Furthermore, Respondent's "Application to Vacate Supersedeas" is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curtis v. Kline
666 A.2d 265 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 A.2d 1288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sj-pa-2006.