In re Singer
273 A.D. 755, 75 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2989
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 12, 1947·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No [756]*756opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion on the authority of Beveridge v. New York E. R. Co. (112 N. Y. 1), Manson v. Curtis (223 N. Y. 313), McQuade v. Stoneham (263 N. Y. 323) and People ex rel. Manice v. Powell (201 N. Y. 194). [189 Misc. 150.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Singer, 273 A.D. 755, 75 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1947 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).
273 A.D. 755 (In re Singer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McQuade v. Stoneham
189 N.E. 234 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Manson v. . Curtis
119 N.E. 559 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
People Ex Rel. Manice v. . Powell
94 N.E. 634 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Beveridge v. New York Elevated Railroad
19 N.E. 489 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
In re Singer
189 Misc. 150 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)