In Re Shuttlesworth

369 U.S. 35, 82 S. Ct. 551, 7 L. Ed. 2d 548, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1704
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 26, 1962
Docket1073, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 369 U.S. 35 (In Re Shuttlesworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Shuttlesworth, 369 U.S. 35, 82 S. Ct. 551, 7 L. Ed. 2d 548, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1704 (1962).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Treating this application for habeas corpus as a petition for certiorari to review the denial by a judge of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit of a certificate of probable cause for appeal (28 U. S. C. § 2253) from the District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, cf. In re Burwell, 350 U. S. 521, 522, we grant it as such, vacate the order of the Court of Appeals, and remand the case to the District Court with instructions to hold the matter while petitioner pursues his state remedies (as indicated in the opinion of Judge Rives denying a certificate of probable cause), including an application for bail to state courts pending disposition of petitioner’s application for state relief. In the event of failure to secure such relief, or to secure admission to bail pending such relief within five (5) days from the date of application for bail, petitioner may, upon appropriate showing, proceed on this application in the United States District Court which may then consider all state remedies exhausted and proceed to hear and determine the cause, including any application for bail pending that court’s final disposition of the matter. The Clerk is directed to issue the judgment forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudler v. Union County
M.D. Pennsylvania, 2021
Nash v. Eberlin
Sixth Circuit, 2006
Darell Nash, Sr. v. Michelle Eberlin
437 F.3d 519 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Miller v. Walker
413 F. Supp. 2d 251 (W.D. New York, 2006)
Landano v. Rafferty
970 F.2d 1230 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Stepney v. Lopes
597 F. Supp. 11 (D. Connecticut, 1984)
Atkins v. Michigan
488 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Michigan, 1980)
Bates v. Estelle
483 F. Supp. 224 (S.D. Texas, 1980)
Abbott v. Laurie
422 F. Supp. 976 (D. Rhode Island, 1976)
Bobick v. Schaeffer
366 F. Supp. 503 (S.D. New York, 1973)
United States ex rel. Pollack v. McGinnis
337 F. Supp. 1220 (S.D. New York, 1971)
Turco v. Maryland
324 F. Supp. 61 (D. Maryland, 1971)
United States Ex Rel. Keating v. Bensinger
322 F. Supp. 784 (N.D. Illinois, 1971)
Simpson v. Spice
318 F. Supp. 554 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1970)
Fred L. Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
399 F.2d 529 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
369 U.S. 35, 82 S. Ct. 551, 7 L. Ed. 2d 548, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shuttlesworth-scotus-1962.