In re: Shapat Nabaya

706 F. App'x 127
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 15, 2017
Docket17-2257
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 706 F. App'x 127 (In re: Shapat Nabaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Shapat Nabaya, 706 F. App'x 127 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit,

PER CURIAM:'

Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya petitions for a writ of error under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2012) seeking the dismissal of the criminal charges against him. He also seeks release on bail pending appeal. We conclude that Nabaya is not entitled to relief.

Federal courts “may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.” 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2012). However, petitioners may not obtain relief under § 1651(a) when there is another available remedy. See United States v. Swaby, 855 F.3d 233, 238 (4th Cir. 2017); United States v. Torres, 282 F.3d 1241, 1245 (10th Cir. 2002), Because Nabaya may assert his claims following entry of a final judgment by the district court, relief under § 1651(a) is not warranted.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of error and deny Nabaya’s motion for release pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nabaya v. Aber
District of Columbia, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 F. App'x 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shapat-nabaya-ca4-2017.