In re Shall

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Shall

717 So. 2d 1127, 1998 La. LEXIS 2596, 1998 WL 556880

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 6, 1998

DocketNo. 98-B-2098

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 717 So. 2d 1127 (In re Shall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shall, 717 So. 2d 1127, 1998 La. LEXIS 2596, 1998 WL 556880 (La. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Shall, David L.; Disciplinary Counsel LSBA; — Plaintiffs); applying for joint petition for interim suspension.

ORDER

Considering the foregoing Joint Petition for Interim Suspension:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that respondent, David L. Shall, attorney at law, be and he hereby is, placed on interim suspension from the practice of law, said suspension to be effective immediately, and remaining in effect until further orders of this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that from the date of filing of this joint petition until the effective date of the interim suspension, respondent shall not undertake the representation of new clients and shall fully comply with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to institute appropriate disciplinary proceedings pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

/s/ Walter F. Marcus, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI