In re Seavolt
This text of 2009 Ohio 1061 (In re Seavolt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re Seavolt, 121 Ohio St.3d 269, 2009-Ohio-1061.]
IN RE SEAVOLT. [Cite as In re Seavolt, 121 Ohio St.3d 269, 2009-Ohio-1061.] Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed. (No. 2007-1258 — Submitted January 21, 2009 — Decided March 17, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Morrow County, Nos. 2006-CA-0010 and 2006-CA-0011, 2007-Ohio-2812. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. D.H., 120 Ohio St.3d 540, 2009-Ohio-9, 901 N.E.2d 209. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Molly J. Bruns, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant, Tracy Seavolt. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 Ohio 1061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-seavolt-ohio-2009.