In re Seaboard Air Line Ry.

166 F. 376, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5306
CourtUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida
DecidedJanuary 5, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 166 F. 376 (In re Seaboard Air Line Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Seaboard Air Line Ry., 166 F. 376, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5306 (circtndfl 1909).

Opinion

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner has no claim against the receivers of the Seaboard Air Line. If he had one growing out of their operation of the railroad property, no leave to sue in any court of competent jurisdiction would be necessary.

The petitioner’s claim is one against the Seaboard Air Line Railway and he may sue said company in any court of competent jurisdiction. If such suit is brought, and service of process shall be made upon any local agent of the receivers, the receivers will appear and defend for the railway- company. Any judgment obtained will have to be certified to the United States Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for payment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dorigan
236 F. Supp. 106 (E.D. New York, 1964)
Jacobowitz v. Thomson
141 F.2d 72 (Second Circuit, 1944)
Echols v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
178 S.E. 139 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)
Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.
66 S.W.2d 903 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1933)
Ihlan v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
163 N.W. 283 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 F. 376, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-seaboard-air-line-ry-circtndfl-1909.