In re Scott
745 A.2d 539, 162 N.J. 571, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 135
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stern’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 321 N.J.Super. 60, 728 A.2d 260 (1999).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O’HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO and LaVECCHIA — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Scott, 745 A.2d 539, 162 N.J. 571, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 135 (N.J. 2000).
745 A.2d 539 (In re Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gina Parascandolo v. Department of Labor, Board of Review, Brick Township Board of Education and Vinny's King Pizza
90 A.3d 669 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)