In re Scott
745 A.2d 539, 162 N.J. 571, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 135
This text of 745 A.2d 539 (In re Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Scott, 745 A.2d 539, 162 N.J. 571, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 135 (N.J. 2000).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stern’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 321 N.J.Super. 60, 728 A.2d 260 (1999).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O’HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO and LaVECCHIA — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gina Parascandolo v. Department of Labor, Board of Review, Brick Township Board of Education and Vinny's King Pizza
90 A.3d 669 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
745 A.2d 539, 162 N.J. 571, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scott-nj-2000.