In Re Scott

24 B.R. 738, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 2933
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama
DecidedNovember 12, 1982
Docket16-10015
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 24 B.R. 738 (In Re Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Scott, 24 B.R. 738, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 2933 (Ala. 1982).

Opinion

ORDER

LEON J. HOPPER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The motion of the debtors to set aside a foreclosure was set for hearing at Montgomery, Alabama, October 20, 1982, and there were present attorneys Karen Knight for the debtors and Charles N. Parnell for the creditor, Avco Financial Services of Alabama, Inc.

No testimony was taken and the matter was submitted to the court on the motion of the debtors and the response of the creditor thereto.

The debtors filed this Chapter 13 case September 2, 1982, and prior to the receipt of any notice, formal or otherwise, the creditor foreclosed its mortgage on the debtors’ residence by foreclosure sale held on September 15, 1982.

The automatic stay provided by Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code is effective upon the filing of the petition. Actions taken in violation of the stay are null and void irrespective of whether the creditor has had any notice of the filing of the case and the accompanying stay. The issue of whether the creditor was without notice and acted in good faith is not relevant inasmuch as this is an action to set aside a foreclosure and not in the nature of a contempt proceeding. In re Hawaii Mini Storage Systems, 2 CBC2d-(Bkrtcy.D.Haw.1980); In re Wheeler, 2 CBC2d-(Bkrtcy.N.D.Ga.1980); In re Eisenberg, 3 CBC2d 440, 7 B.R. 683 (Bkrtcy.E.D.N.Y.1980); In re Barksdale, 5 CBC2d 1163, 15 B.R. 731 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Va.1981); Collier’s on Bankruptcy, 15th Ed. 2:362.03.

The foreclosure sale conducted by Avco on September 15, 1982, was in violation of the automatic stay and is deemed null and void.

It is accordingly ORDERED that the aforesaid foreclosure sale made on September 15, 1982, be and it is hereby set aside and title to the real property of the debtors located at 3306 Santee Drive, Montgomery, Alabama, is restored in and to the debtors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance
513 S.E.2d 692 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1998)
In Re Petroleum Piping Contractors, Inc.
211 B.R. 290 (N.D. Indiana, 1997)
Rivera Garcia v. National Packing Co.
1 T.C.A. 1114 (Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico, 1995)
Flexmaster Aluminum Awning Co., Inc. v. Hirschberg
839 P.2d 1128 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1992)
In Re Bresler
119 B.R. 400 (E.D. New York, 1990)
Huddleston v. Texas Commerce Bank-Dallas, N.A.
756 S.W.2d 343 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Mewes v. BankWest of South Dakota (In Re Mewes)
58 B.R. 124 (D. South Dakota, 1986)
In Re Wlodarski
52 B.R. 856 (S.D. New York, 1985)
In Re Rice
42 B.R. 838 (D. South Dakota, 1984)
In Re Oliver
38 B.R. 245 (D. Minnesota, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 B.R. 738, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 2933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scott-almb-1982.