In re Schwartz

148 A.D.2d 201, 543 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10451
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 27, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 A.D.2d 201 (In re Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Schwartz, 148 A.D.2d 201, 543 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Jeffrey M. Schwartz was admitted to the prac[202]*202tice of law in New York by the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, in March 1969.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee has been investigating a complaint of professional misconduct against respondent concerning an incident in which he misappropriated the proceeds of two checks representing the settlement of an insurance claim on behalf of a client, and converted the funds to his own use. At a time after the commencement of the DDC investigation, respondent voluntarily made full restitution to the client.

Respondent has submitted an affidavit, dated February 21, 1989, in which he seeks to resign from the Bar.

This affidavit fully complies with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 603.11. In the affidavit, respondent states that he is aware that he is the subject of a proceeding pending before the Departmental Disciplinary Committee and that he cannot successfully defend himself on the merits against those charges, that he is resigning freely and voluntarily, without any coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation.

Respondent’s resignation was submitted for review to a Hearing Panel of the DDC which, after due consideration recommended that this court accept respondent’s resignation.

Accordingly, this court accepts respondent’s resignation from the Bar, and it is ordered that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Kupfekman, J. P., Carro, Asch, Ellerin and Smith, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s resignation is accepted and filed, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. [See, 148 AD2d 298.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Schwartz
148 A.D.2d 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 A.D.2d 201, 543 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schwartz-nyappdiv-1989.