In re Scalera

463 N.E.2d 624, 61 N.Y.2d 985, 475 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4207
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 22, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[986] Motion for leave to appeal denied as unnecessary (Dalrymple v Shults Chevrolet, 39 NY2d 795). Motion, treated as one to amend the notice of appeal, granted and the notice of appeal amended to provide for appeal from each and every part of the judgment seeking review of each and every part of the prior order of the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Scalera, 463 N.E.2d 624, 61 N.Y.2d 985, 475 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4207 (N.Y. 1984).

463 N.E.2d 624 (In re Scalera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Finley v. Giacobbe
848 F. Supp. 1146 (S.D. New York, 1994)