In re Scalera
463 N.E.2d 624, 61 N.Y.2d 985, 475 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4207
This text of 463 N.E.2d 624 (In re Scalera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Scalera, 463 N.E.2d 624, 61 N.Y.2d 985, 475 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4207 (N.Y. 1984).
Opinion
[986]*986Motion for leave to appeal denied as unnecessary (Dalrymple v Shults Chevrolet, 39 NY2d 795). Motion, treated as one to amend the notice of appeal, granted and the notice of appeal amended to provide for appeal from each and every part of the judgment seeking review of each and every part of the prior order of the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Finley v. Giacobbe
848 F. Supp. 1146 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
463 N.E.2d 624, 61 N.Y.2d 985, 475 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scalera-ny-1984.