In re Salat

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Salat

653 So. 2d 548, 1995 La. LEXIS 1136, 1995 WL 236800

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 21, 1995

DocketNo. 95-B-0751

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 653 So. 2d 548 (In re Salat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Salat, 653 So. 2d 548, 1995 La. LEXIS 1136, 1995 WL 236800 (La. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PREMISES CONSIDERED:

IT IS ORDERED that Syed A. Salat, be and he hereby is, disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Louisiana pursuant to Rule XIX and XX effective April 29, 1994 (date of interim suspension). In the event respondent’s conviction is reversed on appeal, the consent disbarment will be set aside and Disciplinary Counsel has the right to [549]*549proceed against respondent based upon the alleged violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in these proceedings. In the event respondent’s conviction is affirmed on appeal, respondent’s payment of full restitution or efforts to make restitution mil be considered if respondent applies for reinstatement. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.

VICTORY, J., not on panel. /s/ Signature Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PREMISES CONSIDERED:

IT IS ORDERED that Syed A. Salat, be and he hereby is, disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Louisiana pursuant to Rule XIX and XX effective April 29, 1994 (date of interim suspension). In the event respondent’s conviction is reversed on appeal, the consent disbarment will be set aside and Disciplinary Counsel has the right to [549]*549proceed against respondent based upon the alleged violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in these proceedings. In the event respondent’s conviction is affirmed on appeal, respondent’s payment of full restitution or efforts to make restitution mil be considered if respondent applies for reinstatement. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.

VICTORY, J., not on panel. /s/ Signature Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

653 So. 2d 548, 1995 La. LEXIS 1136, 1995 WL 236800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-salat-la-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack