in Re Ross Hendricks
This text of in Re Ross Hendricks (in Re Ross Hendricks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 25, 2023
No. 04-22-00819-CR
IN RE Ross HENDRICKS
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
On December 7, 2022, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Because relator is represented by trial counsel below, his pro se mandamus petition presented nothing for this court to review. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we denied relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on December 28, 2022.
On January 19, 2023, relator filed a pro se motion for rehearing requesting this court reconsider the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus.2 After consideration, relator’s motion for rehearing is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED on January 25, 2023. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO:__________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022CR11156, styled State of Texas v. Ross Hendricks, pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding. 2 Relator’s filing is titled “Motion to Reverse Memorandum Opinion to Deny Petitioner’s Writ of Mandamus
Because of Error.” We construe relator’s filing as a motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ross Hendricks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ross-hendricks-texapp-2023.