in Re Ross Hendricks
This text of in Re Ross Hendricks (in Re Ross Hendricks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 28, 2022
No. 04-22-00819-CR
IN RE Ross HENDRICKS
Original Proceeding 1
ORDER
On December 7, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on December 28, 2022.
_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of December, 2022.
_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022CR11156, styled State of Texas v. Ross Hendricks, pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ross Hendricks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ross-hendricks-texapp-2022.