In re Rosen
109 A.D.2d 613, 486 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47100
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Rosen. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 A.D.2d 1009 →
Opinion
— Motion granted and respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective March 5, 1985. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Carro, Bloom and Fein, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Rosen, 109 A.D.2d 613, 486 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
109 A.D.2d 613 (In re Rosen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.