in Re Ronald Scott Catt
This text of in Re Ronald Scott Catt (in Re Ronald Scott Catt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 2, 2019.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-19-00231-CV
IN RE RONALD SCOTT CATT, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1123528
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 19, 2019, relator Ronald Scott Catt filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator complains of the February 26, 2019 order transferring venue to Fort Bend County signed by the Honorable William McLeod, presiding judge of County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County, and requests that we compel Judge McLeod to transfer the case to Grimes County.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.1
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
1 Relator also filed a motion to suspend Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b), which requires party to file the original and 11 copies of the original in the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals if the document is not electronically filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.3(b). Because Rule 9.3(b) does not apply to the courts of appeals, we deny the motion. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ronald Scott Catt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-scott-catt-texapp-2019.