in Re Ronald Scott Catt
This text of in Re Ronald Scott Catt (in Re Ronald Scott Catt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Majority and Concurring Opinions filed November 23, 2021.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00438-CV
IN RE RONALD SCOTT CATT, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16-DCV-229074
MEMORANDUM MAJORITY OPINION
On August 5, 2021, relator Ronald Scott Catt filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable O’Neil Williams, presiding judge of the 268th District Court of Fort Bend County, to return forfeited property to relator. Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson (Spain, J., concurring).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Ronald Scott Catt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ronald-scott-catt-texapp-2021.