In re Rodgers

830 A.2d 497, 177 N.J. 501, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 1116
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 5, 2003
StatusPublished

This text of 830 A.2d 497 (In re Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Rodgers, 830 A.2d 497, 177 N.J. 501, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 1116 (N.J. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-082, concluding that JOHN F. RODGERS, JR., of LINDENWOLD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client) and RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver funds or property to a client or third person);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that on reinstatement to the practice of law, respondent be required to practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of one year;

And good- cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN F. RODGERS, JR., is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective October 4, 2003; and it is further

ORDERED that on reinstatement to the practice of law, respondent shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of one year, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[502]*502ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
830 A.2d 497, 177 N.J. 501, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rodgers-nj-2003.