In re Rodgers

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Rodgers

882 A.2d 374, 185 N.J. 136, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1126

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 26, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that JOHN F. RODGERS, JR., of LINDENWOLD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective October 4, 2003, by Order of this Court dated September 5, 2003, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that JOHN F. RODGERS, JR., shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that JOHN F. RODGERS, JR., of LINDENWOLD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective October 4, 2003, by Order of this Court dated September 5, 2003, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that JOHN F. RODGERS, JR., shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court.

In re Rodgers, 882 A.2d 374, 185 N.J. 136, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1126 (N.J. 2005).

Pincite

882 A.2d 374 (In re Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related