In Re Roberts

419 B.R. 20
CourtBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 2009
DocketBankruptcy Nos. 09-8020, 09-8021
StatusPublished

This text of 419 B.R. 20 (In Re Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Roberts, 419 B.R. 20 (bap6 2009).

Opinion

419 B.R. 20 (2009)

In re John E. ROBERTS, Judy K. Roberts, Debtors.
Clyde Hardesty, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
Citifinancial, Inc., Appellee.
In re Honor Friesner, Debtor.
William Todd Drown, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
Citifinancial, Inc., Appellee.

Bankruptcy Nos. 09-8020, 09-8021.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit.

Argued: November 4, 2009.
Decided and Filed: November 9, 2009.

ARGUED: William Todd Drown, Folland & Drown LPA, Mount Vernon, Ohio, for Appellants. Amelia A. Bower, Plunkett Cooney, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: William Todd Drown, Folland & Drown LPA, Mount Vernon, Ohio, for Appellants. Amelia A. Bower, Plunkett Cooney, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee.

*21 Before: FULTON, HARRIS, and RHODES, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

OPINION

RHODES, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge.

After reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, and after considering their oral arguments, the Panel determines that the bankruptcy court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and its conclusions of law are correct. We therefore affirm the bankruptcy court's decision for the reasons stated by that court in its well-written opinion entered in Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts), 402 B.R. 808 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2009), and incorporated in In re Friesner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts)
419 B.R. 20 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 B.R. 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-roberts-bap6-2009.