Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts)

Sixth Circuit

Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts)

419 B.R. 20, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3624

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 9, 2009·No. Bankruptcy Nos. 09-8020, 09-8021·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

RHODES, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge.

After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, and after considering their oral arguments, the Panel determines that the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and its conclusions of law are correct. We therefore affirm the bankruptcy court’s decision for the reasons stated by that court in its well-written opinion entered in Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts), 402 B.R. 808 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2009), and incorporated in In re Friesner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

RHODES, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge.

After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, and after considering their oral arguments, the Panel determines that the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and its conclusions of law are correct. We therefore affirm the bankruptcy court’s decision for the reasons stated by that court in its well-written opinion entered in Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts), 402 B.R. 808 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2009), and incorporated in In re Friesner.

Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts), 419 B.R. 20, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3624 (bap6 2009).

Pincite

419 B.R. 20 (Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related