Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts)
This text of 419 B.R. 20 (Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, and after considering their oral arguments, the Panel determines that the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and its conclusions of law are correct. We therefore affirm the bankruptcy court’s decision for the reasons stated by that court in its well-written opinion entered in Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In re Roberts), 402 B.R. 808 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2009), and incorporated in In re Friesner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 B.R. 20, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardesty-v-citifinancial-inc-in-re-roberts-bap6-2009.