In re Road

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Road

8 N.J.L. 171

DecidedMay 15, 1825

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.J.L. 171 (In re Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Road, 8 N.J.L. 171 (N.J. 1825).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton moved for the allowance of a certiorari to the Court of Common Pleas of the county of Burlington. Surveyors were appointed by that court in November last, by whom a return was made, to which a caveat was filed, and in February last freeholders were appointed to review the road, at the instance of the party now applying for the certiorari ; the freeholders had met and had not made a certificate, but “ the term next succeeding that in which they were appointed,” (Rev. Laws, 611, see. 7) had not yet arrived, and no order of that court for the recording of the return had been made.

The court declined the allowance of the writ, deeming the application premature.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton moved for the allowance of a certiorari to the Court of Common Pleas of the county of Burlington. Surveyors were appointed by that court in November last, by whom a return was made, to which a caveat was filed, and in February last freeholders were appointed to review the road, at the instance of the party now applying for the certiorari ; the freeholders had met and had not made a certificate, but “ the term next succeeding that in which they were appointed,” (Rev. Laws, 611, see. 7) had not yet arrived, and no order of that court for the recording of the return had been made.

The court declined the allowance of the writ, deeming the application premature.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.J.L. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-road-nj-1825.