In re Road
This text of 7 N.J.L. 36 (In re Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is true, that as the act formerly stood, we had fallen into an idea that there need be only five from each county; but, upon reflection, we think there must be ten freeholders from each county where the road is applied for, to be laid out in two counties. The petition, therefore, will be refused, as it is deficient in two particulars; it has not ten from each county, nor even five from each county, it has only ton from one county, which has never been held sufficient.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 N.J.L. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-road-nj-1823.