In re Riddlesprigger

603 B.R. 824
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama
DecidedJune 14, 2019
DocketCase No. 18-10615-WRS
StatusPublished

This text of 603 B.R. 824 (In re Riddlesprigger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Riddlesprigger, 603 B.R. 824 (Ala. 2019).

Opinion

Because the Department of Revenue received a corrected application outside of the 30-day window to relate back to the original date of the lien, the Trustee contends it may avoid the secured claim and treat it as an unsecured debt. Conversely, Exeter Finance claims that this was a mere clerical error and that the Court should treat the claim as secured.

II. Law

A. Jurisdiction

This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction to hear this proceeding pursuant to *82728 U.S.C. § 1334(b). This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B). This is a final order.

B. Applicable Bankruptcy and State Law

1. Proof of Claim Process

The filing and allowance of a creditor's claims are essential to the operation of bankruptcy courts. Creditors must file a proof of claim to preserve their right to payment from the bankruptcy estate. 11 U.S.C. § 501. Rule 3002 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure sets out the requirements for filing a proof of claim in Chapter 13 cases. A creditor's claim will be allowed as filed unless an interested party objects. 11 U.S.C. § 502(a). If there is an objection, the court will determine if the claim should be allowed and for what amount. 11 U.S.C. § 502(b). To be timely, the creditor must file its claim "not later than 70 days after the order for relief under that chapter" or the date of the order of conversion. Fed. R. Bank. P. 3002(c).

2. Trustee's Avoidance Power

A creditor's claim will not be allowed as secured if it is subject to avoidance by the bankruptcy trustee. In re Davis , 269 B.R. 914, 915 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2001) ; see also 11 U.S.C. § 544(a). Section 544(a) gives the bankruptcy trustee the priority of a judgment lien creditor and allows the trustee to avoid an unperfected security interest by relegating it to the status of an unsecured claim. In re Patterson , 185 B.R. 354, 357 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1995) ; see also In re Wheaton Oaks Office Partners Ltd. Partnership , 27 F.3d 1234, 1244 (7th Cir. 1994) ; In re Pacific Express, Inc. , 780 F.2d 1482, 1486 (9th Cir. 1986). Therefore, a creditor's security interest in its collateral must be perfected at the time of filing to defeat the interest of the trustee. First Nat. Bank of Denver v. Turley , 705 F.2d 1024, 1027 (8th Cir. 1983) ; See also In re Bell , 194 B.R. 192, 198 (Bankr. S.D. Ill. 1996) (holding the Chapter 13 Trustee could avoid the creditor's unperfected liens on two automobiles); In re Church , 206 B.R. 180, 186 (Bankr. S.D. Ill. 1997) (holding trustee may avoid an unperfected automobile lien); In re Milcher , 86 B.R. 103, 104 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1988) (unperfected security interest in a vehicle was subject to avoidance by the trustee); In re Guiles , 580 B.R. 466, 469 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2017) (holding the trustee may challenge and avoid unperfected liens even if they are not in the debtor's best interest). Section 544 serves the purpose of cutting off unperfected security interests as of the commencement of the case. In re Canney , 284 F.3d 362, 374 (2d Cir. 2002) This, in turn, benefits creditors by increasing the size of the bankruptcy estate. In re Ryan , 851 F.2d 502, 512 (1st Cir. 1988) ; see also In re Zedda , 103 F.3d 1195, 1201 (5th Cir. 1997) (noting the trustee exercises her avoidance powers in an attempt to increase the size of the bankruptcy estate).

3. Vehicle Perfection Process

In Bankruptcy, property interests are defined by state law. Butner v. United States , 440 U.S. 48, 99, 99 S.Ct. 914, 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaudet v. Babin (In Re Zedda)
103 F.3d 1195 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Butner v. United States
440 U.S. 48 (Supreme Court, 1979)
In Re Milcher
86 B.R. 103 (W.D. Michigan, 1988)
Hill v. McGee
562 So. 2d 238 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)
McRoberts v. WFS Financial, Inc. (In Re Church)
206 B.R. 180 (S.D. Illinois, 1997)
In Re Minbatiwalla
424 B.R. 104 (S.D. New York, 2010)
In Re Millerburg
61 B.R. 125 (E.D. North Carolina, 1986)
Patterson v. Spradlin (In Re Patterson)
185 B.R. 354 (N.D. Alabama, 1995)
In Re Davis
269 B.R. 914 (M.D. Alabama, 2001)
Kelley v. Citizens Bank (In Re Russell)
227 B.R. 196 (M.D. Georgia, 1998)
McRoberts v. Transouth Financial (In Re Bell)
194 B.R. 192 (S.D. Illinois, 1996)
In Re Anderson
330 B.R. 180 (S.D. Texas, 2005)
Walker v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In re Clark)
112 B.R. 226 (E.D. Tennessee, 1990)
Pongetti v. National Bank of Commerce (In re Frady)
276 B.R. 456 (N.D. Mississippi, 2000)
In re Jones
544 B.R. 692 (M.D. Alabama, 2016)
Mottaz v. Keidel
613 F.2d 172 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
First National Bank of Denver v. Turley
705 F.2d 1024 (Eighth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 B.R. 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-riddlesprigger-almb-2019.