In Re Rice

234 P.2d 180, 105 Cal. App. 2d 493, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1497
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 17, 1951
DocketCrim. 4688
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 234 P.2d 180 (In Re Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Rice, 234 P.2d 180, 105 Cal. App. 2d 493, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1497 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinions

McCOMB, J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking the. release of petitioner on bail pending a hearing in the superior court to determine whether or not petitioner is a “sexual psychopath.”

Facts: On June 22, 1951, petitioner was certified by the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles to the Superior [494]*494Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles for a hearing and examination by said court as to whether or not petitioner is a “sexual psychopath” under the provisions of chapter 4, part 1 of division VI of the Welfare "and Institutions Code of the State of California, as amended.

The superior court on said date set July 23, 1951, as the date for the examination and hearing of petitioner relative to such matter, and denied petitioner bail pending such hearing, remanding him to the custody of the sheriff of Los Angeles County.

He then filed the present application for a writ of habeas corpus and this court released him on bail in the sum of $500 pending a hearing upon such writ.

This is the sole question presented for our determination:

Is petitioner entitled to be released on bail pending the determination of whether or not he is a “sexual psychopath”?

Yes. When a petitioner is arrested pursuant to the provisions of section 5501 of the Welfare and Institutions Code,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McElroy v. Director of Patuxent Institution
127 A.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1956)
Gross v. Superior Court
270 P.2d 1025 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
In Re Rice
234 P.2d 180 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 P.2d 180, 105 Cal. App. 2d 493, 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rice-calctapp-1951.