In re R.G.
Opinion
[Cite as In re R.G., 120 Ohio St.3d 359, 2008-Ohio-6694.]
IN RE R.G. [Cite as In re R.G., 120 Ohio St.3d 359, 2008-Ohio-6694.] Discretionary appeal accepted and judgment of the court of appeals reversed on the authority of In re T.R. (No. 2008-1474 — Submitted November 18, 2008 — Decided December 24, 2008.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 22482, 2008-Ohio-2895. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re T.R., 120 Ohio St.3d 136, 2008-Ohio-5219, 896 N.E.2d 1003. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. O’DONNELL, J., would accept the appeal but remand the cause for consideration of In re T.R. __________________ Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jill R. Sink, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant, Montgomery County Children Services. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2008 Ohio 6694 (In re R.G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.